GM and Chrysler have presented business plans to the government in return for more bailout cash. I don’t know if a new ad/marketing strategy is in the mix, but here is a take on what they are doing wrong and how to fix it. Click here to read part I.
1. The auto makers over use rented media channels with interruption style advertising, and the basic auto ad has not changed in 50 years. The ads show the car being used by one of their stock cliché characters – the executive, the harried mom, the twenty something on the go, the tough guy truck owner, the hapless suburban dad, etc. The ads are slices of life showing our heroes using the product. This is ineffective because there is much waste; and the creative is boring and unmemorable. The auto companies are big at buying sponsorships that just slaps their name on anything and everything. Chevrolet spends big bucks to sponsor the “player of the game” during televised college footballs games. Why do they do this? Awareness? How many men watching football have not heard of Chevy? I am sure it makes the Chevy execs happy, but has it ever sold a single car or truck? In fact, has anyone ever bought a car based on a TV ad?
2. American car companies sell with price, price and price. The ads always stress the price cut or financing incentive. If you train consumers to wait for the deal you will never get full price. That is a problem when your union contracts give you a $2000/per car disadvantage against the Japanese automakers. They need to stop the addiction to price selling and sell value. They are two different marketing messages.
3. All the auto companies are out of balance when it comes to customer acquisition and retention marketing efforts. The majority of the marketing budgets are aimed at convincing new customers to buy their cars while they give lip service to customer retention. Some of the manufacturers have custom magazines for their owners but they seem half-hearted. I used to get a magazine from Acura and it was full of underwhelming content. This year I leased a Mercedes and bought a Honda Accord and the follow up communication from both brands and been almost non-existent. I have received a few weak emails that are selling me accessories and their overpriced service.
It would be more efficient to create long term customers rather than trying to sell new customers over and over. This is an area where I would suggest the biggest changes for the auto companies. They should peel off some the budget they are shoveling at TV to create private media channels to talk directly to their current customers to create a long term relationship. This private media channel needs to have high quality original content from subject matter experts and great writers. They need to create a real relationship based on affinity and trust with their customers, not just send them a magazine with travel articles and offers to buy floor mats, mugs and logoed junk. In addition, try working in some new media – interactive webcasts for owners to get more from their car, and social media to connect owners and build community.
4. I would suggest more live test drive events where people can get inside a car and try it out. It is a better experience without a sales guy breathing down your neck asking “how much do you want to pay per month”. I went to a Mercedes test drive event about six years ago and decided on that day I would someday own a fine German auto. In the time since that event Mercedes has probably hit me with a few millions dollars worth of rented media ads via magazines, newspapers, television, radio and billboards. All those ads combined didn’t have a fraction of impact of the afternoon I spent getting to touch and feel the product and have a direct educational dialog the company. On that day they built a level of trust and affinity with me that no traditional ad could ever duplicate.
The bottom line: They need to stop renting media and own their own media channel.

