The Detroit Three are back in Washington, D.C. again. Originally, they asked for $25B but after careful review and creating plans to put their businesses back on track they are now up to $34B.
It is obvious that what has always been done will not work so I posed the question “how would you reorganize the auto industry” to a group of marketing professionals. The answers were eye opening.
Only one person felt the companies should be bailed out (and they work with the auto makers). Everyone else had suggestions from Chapter 11 to just letting this take its natural course as a free economy does.
The responses are clear though – the auto industry must follow these simple steps:
• Understand your customer and market
• Understand your competitors
• Lower your costs: negotiate outdated contracts, realign salaries and bonuses
• Invest in new technology
When you look at this list, the first two items are in the control of marketing in most organizations. Operations owns the third, and the fourth is combination of marketing, operations, engineering and finance.
In the end I think the answer is pretty clear, we need as a country to assist the big three automakers. Even if we help them fail through consolidation, reorganization or even loans. What we cannot agree to is just opening the checkbook without a series of measurable checkpoints and accountability.
Let me share some of the responses I received. Feel free to add yours to the list.
• Maybe the first question is “would” you save the auto industry? Surely if an industry is no longer able to sustain itself, maybe it is no longer viable in its present form or there are too many suppliers servicing too small a market - then the ‘kindest’ thing to do in the long run is to let it die or change organically (the most viable and healthiest parts will morph into something that there is a market for) Darwinism for business ? I do appreciate that this is a very simplistic view and such a move will have massive repercussions, but worth thinking about.
• Mainframes have evolved into distributed computing - much more powerful. The Big Three; let them die - let the remaining assets be utilized by the brightest minds in the U.S. automobile industry and watch the industry be revolutionized. The short term pain of cutting the losses and investing assets into our future auto industry makes sense, and those leading this transformation can redefine the standards in automobile manufacturing and put America back on top where we belong. This advancement in computing has changed the world and the principles behind this evolution can be applied to new business models. Big corporations are fighting to stay alive - what our business sector needs is American innovation and the American Entrepreneurial Mindset. I’ll put my money on a thousand innovators over senseless corporate giants any day!
• The car industry is still making candles long after the light bulb has taken over. Heck, we’ve moved on to better, more efficient light bulbs.
• US automakers hands are tied in many cases because foreign auto makers have advantageous support through their home governments (i.e. the Japanese government underwrites much of the R&D costs for Japanese automakers)
US quality, which for a time was sub-par, has now reached a point where it’s competitive with the industry. It’s difficult to try and spread that message without having people accuse you of practicing ‘typical PR spin’ (though it’s not).
You’d be surprised to know how many other parts of the US economy would fail without the $’s coming out of the auto industry. Basically the entire Midwest would be down the tubes for good. And the failure of GM or Ford would likely cause the other to fail, as well, meaning saving one means saving both (at least for the short term).
Why is it okay to bail out banking industries and not the auto industry? The auto industry is equally tied (and has taken no more and no fewer liberties in how they treat their customers, as well) to the economic base of our country, but people for some reason have a harder time acknowledging this fact.
• I used to work in automotive marketing, and watching it’s decline has been very sad for me to see. Ford and GM have wasted far too much time competing against one another - and have lost share to Toyota, Nissan, Honda, and all the major players while doing so. If one of the two would have made the decision to compete against these global competitors instead of each other - that one would be in a great position. Even the spots now are Ford Vs. GM. Ford spending millions on new F-150 ads, while GM promotes their Silverado. Guess what? No one cares anymore. You are talking to yourselves.
The only solution I see is a very painful one. GM and Ford merge to become a relevant global competitor. Tool plants to make one great truck combining both companies technologies. Tool other plants to make great cars. Consolidation is needed to compete on a global scale - the big three needs to consolidate now, or die a slow, painful death.
This solution is painful. Short term, it would be horrible for Detroit. The loss of jobs would be at a very large scale. Keep the best. Lose the rest. Then develop a global powerhouse that can compete on a global scale - with World class management, World class cars and trucks, the support and intelligence of both companies.
Yes - painful short term. But if Detroit wishes to pass the torch to the next generation, the decision needs to be made and fast. Can management swallow their pride?